The questions are selected from a pre-interview they did while strapped to a polygraph. Contestants must answer 21 questions truthfully in order to win $500,000. "The Moment of Truth" premiered on Fox in January and has performed very well in the ratings. ![]() After she answered that question truthfully, her ex-boyfriend, Frank, not to be confused with her husband, Frank, took the stage to ask, "If I wanted to get back together with you, would you leave your husband?" Yes, said Cleri - whose husband, parents and siblings were sitting before her, along with a studio audience and 8.9 million television viewers - she has taken off her wedding ring when out with friends, and, yes, she was still in love with a former boyfriend on her wedding day. And, according to an article in the New York Post, Cleri and her husband are now separated because of it. On Monday night's episode of the Fox game show "The Moment of Truth," Lauren Cleri admitted that she had been fired from a job for stealing money, would rather give food to a dog than a homeless person, knows things about her father that she keeps from her mother and has avoided sex with her husband by pretending to be asleep. 'The Moment of Truth' turns into a time of pain In practice, a lie detector is just a "how nervous you got with this question in comparison to other questions" /showtracker/2008/02/the-moment-of-t.html increased heart rhythm) is caused with lying, it doesn't mean it cannot be caused by anything else. The theory behind this is too complex to write it here, but the main point is that just because an effect (e.g. ![]() And what does knowledge have to say about them? Well, lie detectors work by detecting certain effects in your body associated with lying. Flipping a coin would be right 50% of the time. And what does science have to say about lie detectors? Well, several studies have determined polygraphs are right ~60% of the time. "why everyone does x is it's wrong" is not an argument to decide that x is right. It's still easy to ask to a doctor to give you a healthy diet and get one that is based on debunked conjectures.Īnyway, yours is not a valid way to understand reality. Pseudosciences are still widespread in modern society. There's a YouTube channel called vsauce2 that has a few videos on judges accepting mathematical bullshit as evidence to convict people for heinous crimes they didn't commit, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. Top tier police, investigators and judges use pseudoscience for their job all over the world. (i.e.%2C%20validity),person%20may%20be%20non%2Danxious.īecause we are humans, not machines. Here are just a couple of links from decent sources but there's plenty more: I'm not making this up, what I'm saying isn't even controversial from most that have studied this. The "lie detector" thing is just branding from long ago that has stuck in our culture. Some pseudo scientific method based on out dated assumptions from the early 20th century can't and doesn't reliably make those kind of determinations. And the truth of a situation is complicated and is based on perceptions and beliefs. The polygraph methods are not reliable for the determine the the truth. Often the polygraph has been shown to be wrong. ![]() But so can flipping a coin or making an educated guess based the on available evidence. Courts are far from from infallible and have relied on all kinds of bad methodologies.Ĭan a polygraph be right about whether a person is lying? Of course it could be. Criminal justices systems around the world have consistently been flawed in many ways. Like I said before they are used in criminal cases based on old bad pseudoscience that was accepted from an earlier era. The show was speculating with how the lie detector works. It works with pure facts like did something happen or it did not. For example the lie detector is not working with emotions/feelings/statements. The idea of exposing someone and shocking the audience is great for a tv show and this is why it was quite successful, but it is majorly flawed and faked. Like what happens if a perfect family goes there? Easy reward if there was no speculation with the lie detector. How are the questions so perfectly made for each contestant is also extremely fishy pointing to it all being fake or at least most of it. The premise of the show is one of the dumbest ever made - like why would you LIE if you already went to a LIE DETECTOR and they know the truth?! Are people this dumb to think they can cheat it? Some can but it takes serious preparations and it's a very small % of people (generally psychopaths)!īesides the whole point of the participants answering those questions is MONEY so why would they be dumb enough to RISK getting this sweet reward and still pathetically exposing their biggest secrets?! You are either prepared to tell all the shit you can be asked or you don't.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |